Skip to content

Trekking poles, read on the four figures that are actually published

Poles are sold on a weight that is sometimes per pole and sometimes for the pair, and on a length range that occasionally contradicts itself within the same listing. This guide separates the figures you can rely on from the ones you have to check.

Poles are the cheapest piece of kit on this site that changes how a long descent feels, and they are bought on four figures. Three of those are usually published. The fourth is usually not.

Weight, and whether it is one pole or two

This family is better than most on this site at labelling its weights, and that is worth saying plainly: most of these listings state a figure per pole and say so explicitly.

The KEYTYTAR states 169 g per pole, in its title and again in its bullets. The Alpteq states 231 g per pole. The Atacama and the Terra Peak both state 270 g per pole. The NORDMUT states 325 g per pole. The PINUQUEST elsewhere on this site states 260 g per pole for its aluminium version and 210 g for the carbon one, and names which version the reference is.

Against that background the Underwood Aggregator stands out: 560 g, unlabelled. That figure is roughly two of the mid-weight poles above, and it is also plausible as a single heavy telescopic pole. The listing does not say, and there is no way to tell from the page.

The Frasheng publishes no weight per pole at all.

Between the KEYTYTAR at 169 g and the NORDMUT at 325 g there is nearly double the mass, carried in your hands for the whole day. That is the single biggest spread in this family.

Packed length, and where it goes missing

If poles travel inside a case or a pack, packed length decides the purchase before anything else.

The Alpteq states 35 cm folded. The Atacama states 36 cm, the DOBESTS 36 cm in its supplied bag, the Frasheng 36 cm. The Underwood Aggregator states 45 cm in its bag — the length of a telescopic pole that collapses into itself rather than folding at joints.

The KEYTYTAR does not publish one, and neither does the Terra Peak or the NORDMUT. On the KEYTYTAR that is the notable gap, because a folding carbon pole at 169 g is exactly the pole somebody buys to put in a case.

Length range, and the listings that contradict themselves

Maximum length is published everywhere. Two listings publish it more than once and do not agree with themselves.

The Frasheng gives its adjustment range as 108 to 135 cm in its title and 115 to 135 cm in its bullets. Its shaft material is published twice too: 7075 aluminium alloy in the bullets, carbon and aluminium in the title. Neither pair is reconciled on the page, and both are the sort of thing to settle with the seller before ordering rather than after.

The rest are consistent. The Alpteq adjusts 115 to 135 cm. The Atacama 110 to 135. The Terra Peak 110 to 135. The NORDMUT 65 to 135. The Underwood Aggregator 60 to 135. The KEYTYTAR is the outlier at 63 to 125 cm — a lower ceiling than everything else here, and the figure to check against your own height before the 169 g becomes tempting.

A wide range matters in a household where more than one person uses the poles, and it matters if you shorten them for a climb and lengthen them for the descent.

The lock, and why its absence is a real omission

The lock is the moving part. It is what slips when a pole is loaded on a steep step, and it is what you retighten with cold hands.

Atacama states an external flip-lock lever for stepless height adjustment. Terra Peak names its lever system — an aluminium external lever the maker calls Fastlock. Frasheng states an external flip-lock lever, which its title calls a clamp closure. The Underwood Aggregator states both an external flip-lock lever and a twist collar on the lower section, and publishes instructions for tightening each — which is more than any other listing here does.

The Alpteq, the KEYTYTAR and the NORDMUT name no lock mechanism at all. That is a real gap, because an internal twist lock and an external lever are serviced completely differently, and one of them can be adjusted in gloves.

Not one listing in this family publishes a section count.

Grips: cork or foam, and what each is for

Cork absorbs sweat and holds its shape to the hand over time. Foam is lighter and warmer in the cold, and it wears faster.

Alpteq states natural cork with a non-slip EVA extension below it. Atacama states cork in a dual-grip arrangement following the shape of the hand. Terra Peak states real cork with an extended EVA hand grip. NORDMUT states natural cork with an EVA foam extension, stated to absorb sweat and insulate against cold. Frasheng states cork described as non-slip with sweaty hands.

KEYTYTAR and the Underwood Aggregator both state EVA foam. On the KEYTYTAR that is part of how the 169 g is reached.

The extension below the grip is the detail worth looking for: it lets you drop your hand down a traverse without stopping to change the length.

Tips and baskets, which are the parts you replace

Attachments are supplied generously across this family and described loosely.

The Underwood Aggregator supplies four sets — rubber tips, mud tips, boot tips and snow tips. The PINUQUEST supplies four pairs for asphalt, terrain, mud and snow. NORDMUT supplies three pairs of rubber buffers and two anti-sink baskets. Atacama supplies a rubber buffer set with a water-repellent bag. KEYTYTAR supplies snow and mud baskets.

Here is the recurring gap: almost none of these listings names a thread or fitting standard, so a replacement basket ordered on a photograph may not fit. The Frasheng is the exception and it is worth noting — it states two small screw-on trekking baskets and two screw-on snow baskets, and it is the only listing here that says how they fix.

Where each pair lands

Alpteq for a pole that goes in a case: 35 cm folded, 231 g per pole, cork over carbon. KEYTYTAR if the gram count rules and 125 cm is enough length. Atacama for a folding pole with a named lock and a published packed length. Terra Peak for a named external lever and cork grips on a telescopic shaft. NORDMUT for a warm cork grip on a long day, at 325 g a pole. Frasheng for screw-on baskets, once the contradictions in its own listing are settled. Underwood Aggregator for a household of mixed heights, if you are content with an unlabelled 560 g.

What we would carry, and why

  1. Alpteq folding carbon poles, 115–135 cm, 35 cm packed, 231 g per pole

    Folding · 115–135 cm · 35 cm packed, the shortest published here · Carbon 3K · 231 g per pole stated · natural cork grip with EVA extension · lock not named

    The shortest packed length published in this hub at 35 cm, on a Carbon 3K folding pair stated at 231 g per pole — with no lock named and no tips supplied.

    Best for: Travelling light with poles inside a case, where 35 cm packed and 231 g per pole are the figures being bought.

    ≈ 59 €

  2. KEYTYTAR folding carbon poles, 63–125 cm, 169 g per pole

    Folding carbon · 63–125 cm · 169 g per pole stated, the lightest published here · EVA foam grip · snow and mud baskets supplied · lock and packed length not stated

    The lightest per-pole weight published in this hub at a stated 169 g, on a folding carbon pair with the lowest maximum length here and no lock named.

    Best for: A long day or a fast pack where every gram is counted and 125 cm is enough length for you.

    ≈ 60 €

  3. Atacama folding poles, 3K carbon and 7075 aluminium, 36 cm packed, 270 g per pole

    Folding · 110–135 cm · 36 cm packed · 3K carbon with 7075 aluminium · 270 g per pole stated · flip-lock lever · cork dual-grip

    A folding pair that names both of its materials — 3K carbon and 7075 aluminium — alongside a flip-lock, a 36 cm packed length and a stated 270 g per pole.

    Best for: A day walk or a trekking tour where a folding pole has to travel inside a case and the weight is being counted.

    ≈ £42 / 34 €

  4. Terra Peak telescopic aluminium poles, 110–135 cm, 270 g per pole

    Telescopic aluminium · 110–135 cm · Fastlock external lever named · 270 g per pole stated · cork grips with EVA extension · packed length not published

    A telescopic aluminium pair that names its external lever system, publishes 270 g per pole and cork grips, and never says how short it goes.

    Best for: A walker who wants a named external lever and cork grips, and who carries poles on the outside of a pack.

    ≈ 43 €

  5. NORDMUT telescopic aluminium poles, 65–135 cm, 325 g per pole

    Telescopic aluminium · 65–135 cm · 325 g per pole stated · natural cork grips with EVA extension · three rubber tip pairs and two anti-sink baskets · lock not named

    Natural cork grips with a foam extension and the heaviest per-pole figure published in this hub, at a stated 325 g, on a pole that never names its lock.

    Best for: Long days where a real cork grip and a warm hand matter more than the last hundred grams.

    ≈ £40 / 34 €

  6. Frasheng telescopic poles, 36 cm packed, cork grips, screw-on baskets

    Telescopic · 36 cm packed · flip-lock lever · cork grips · screw-on trekking and snow baskets · range and material both published twice, and they disagree

    Cork grips, a flip-lock and proper screw-on baskets — on a listing that gives two different adjustment ranges and two different shaft materials, and never reconciles either.

    Best for: A walker who wants cork grips and baskets that screw on properly, and who will confirm the range and the material before ordering.

    ≈ 22 €

  7. Underwood Aggregator telescopic aluminium poles, 60–135 cm, 45 cm packed

    Telescopic aluminium · 60–135 cm · 45 cm packed · flip-lock lever plus a lower twist collar · EVA grip · four tip sets · 560 g, unlabelled

    A telescopic aluminium pair with the widest stated adjustment range here and four sets of tips, publishing 560 g without saying whether that is one pole or two.

    Best for: A household where one pair has to suit more than one height, and the accessories matter more than the gram count.

    ≈ £20 / 23 €

What people ask before buying

Is the published weight for one pole or for two?

Most listings here say per pole and mean it: 169 g on the KEYTYTAR, 231 g on the Alpteq, 260 g on the DOBESTS, 270 g on the Atacama and the Terra Peak, 325 g on the NORDMUT. The Underwood Aggregator states 560 g with no label at all, and an unlabelled figure of that size could be either.

What is the difference between a folding and a telescopic pole?

A folding pole breaks into sections joined by a cord and packs short — 35 cm on the Alpteq, 36 cm on the Atacama and the DOBESTS. A telescopic pole slides inside itself, packs longer and usually adjusts over a wider range. The Underwood Aggregator packs to 45 cm and adjusts from 60 cm.

Why does the lock mechanism matter?

Because it is what fails, and it is what you tighten in the rain. An external flip-lock lever can be adjusted by hand; a twist collar cannot always be. Several listings here name no lock at all, which means you find out on delivery.

How do I pick a length?

The Alpteq listing publishes a rule of thumb — height in centimetres multiplied by 0.68 — and the PINUQUEST states a range suiting roughly 95 to 200 cm of user height. Both are the maker's own guidance rather than a standard, and adjustable poles are forgiving of a rough first setting.

Prices in these summaries were read on the dates each review gives. The live figure sits beside every product.

The tool we use ourselves

Chosen your kit? Now buy it at the right price.

This is a summer category: demand for tents, sleeping bags and stoves is at its lowest in November and at its highest in July and August, and a price crossed out in the middle of that swing tells you nothing on its own. UniverTrack records what each retailer has actually been charging, so a reduction is measured against the price that really held rather than against one that never did, and alerts you when it is genuinely the moment to buy.

Real price historyBuy-now alertsAI buying assistant
Try free for 14 days →
No commitment · Cancel in one click · 5 languages