Shape and tie-out count decide how many pitches you actually get · review
A hammock tarp that contradicts itself twice on the same page — nylon or polyester, 0.8 kg or 650 g — while publishing the smallest packed size in this hub.
The bottom line The smallest pack in the hub, cut for a hammock, on a page that cannot agree with itself about what it is made of or what it weighs.
A tarp cut at 3.40 × 2.80 m for use over a hammock, packing to 25 × 10 cm, supplied with a small colour-matched fabric bag.
The fabric. The title says ripstop nylon. The description says 100% polyester ripstop (210T), PUR-coated. Those are different materials with different wet behaviour — the hub intro sets out exactly that difference — and the listing carries both claims.
The weight. The title says 0.8 kg. The description says the own weight is 650 g. That is 150 g apart, which in a hammock kit already carrying straps and carabiners is not a rounding difference.
This page reports both in both cases rather than choosing between them.
25 × 10 cm packed. The smallest in this hub, and given as a dimension. 3.40 × 2.80 m of cut, sized for a hammock rather than for a ground pitch. And the maker names which of its own hammock ranges the tarp pairs with.
No hydrostatic head behind the words water-repellent. No tie-out count and no reinforcement described. And nothing in the bag but the tarp and its own small stuff sack.
Plan for guylines separately, and read the weight you are budgeting for as the higher of the two figures until the maker says otherwise.
Selling between 56 € and 77 € across the German, French, Italian and Spanish Amazon stores when this page was checked.
It also sells on the British Amazon store in the local currency, which the range above does not cover — that range counts euro stores and nothing else.
Catalogued on the American Amazon store with nobody selling it: the reference is there, the offer is not.
Every figure in this section is what Keepa returned on the day this page was last updated. Prices and offers change without notice.
Prices quoted in this text were read on 6 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.
| Shape and cut | Rectangular flat cut, 3.40 × 2.80 m — stated; no catenary cut is described |
|---|---|
| Dimensions | 3.40 × 2.80 m — stated in the title |
| Fabric and coating | The listing gives two answers — the title says ripstop nylon, the description says 100% polyester ripstop (210T), PUR-coated |
| Hydrostatic head | Not published on the listing — the tarp is described as water-repellent, with no millimetre figure |
| Denier | Not published on the listing — 210T is a thread count and no denier figure is published |
| Tie-out count | Not published on the listing |
| Tie-out reinforcement | Not published on the listing |
| Weight | The listing gives two figures — 0.8 kg in the title and 650 g as the own weight in the description |
| What the pack includes | The tarp and a small colour-matched fabric bag — stated; no guylines, pegs or poles are listed |
| Amazon reference | B00U4FE9AS (same reference on 6 Amazon marketplaces) |
| EAN | 4030454005241 |
It does, and the hub intro says why: silicone-coated nylon stretches when it gets wet and needs retensioning, while polyester barely moves. A tarp pitched taut over a hammock behaves differently depending on which one it is, and this listing says both on the same page.
This page reports both, because both are the maker's. The title says 0.8 kg and the description says 650 g as the own weight, and 150 g is a real difference in a hammock kit that is already carrying straps. Nothing on the page resolves it.
Camping tarp · 300 × 300 cm · 150T ripstop polyester, 3000 PU coating · seam-sealed · webbing-reinforced load points · 1 kg stated · four ropes and four pegs supplied
A 3 × 3 m tarp with a coating figure, sealed seams, webbing at every load point and a stated 1 kg — and no count for the load points it reinforces.
Best for: A square tarp bought complete, where sealed seams and reinforced load points matter more than pack weight.
≈ £44 / 38 €
Flat cover sheet · 3 × 3 m stated as 9 m² · 140 g/m² PP/PE weave · aluminium eyelets at 50 cm · rubber-reinforced corners · ±5% stated tolerance
A woven cover sheet with the tightest eyelet spacing here at 50 cm — and a stated ±5% tolerance on every dimension it publishes.
Best for: A groundsheet under a tent, or a cover where a close eyelet spacing gives more places to tie down.
≈ £21 / 16 €
Camping tarp · 3 × 3 m · ripstop polyester, no coating named · 1.94 kg stated · 65 × 7 × 7 cm packed · guylines and two poles supplied
A 3 × 3 m tarp that arrives with its own two poles and a stated 1.94 kg — and names no coating, no denier and no tie-out count at all.
Best for: A pitch on open ground — a beach, a pitch beside a vehicle — where poles matter more than pack weight.
≈ 35 €
