R-value carries the warmth; thickness decides whether your hip lands · review
The widest mat here at 83 cm (32.7 in), with every dimension published, a 50D fabric, three patches in the box — and no weight anywhere.
An inflated size of 200 × 83 × 12 cm (78.7 × 32.7 × 4.7 in), a deflated size of 32 × 14 × 10 cm (12.6 × 5.5 × 3.9 in), an integrated ergonomic pillow 16.5 cm (6.5 in) high, an integrated foot pump stated at about 80 seconds with a double-walled valve at the head deflating in one second, 50D spring nylon with a waterproof TPU coating, press studs along one side for joining two mats, and a box containing the mat, a drawstring bag, three TPU patches, an elastic band and instructions.
That is the number to read first. Standard mats here run 63 to 68 cm (24.8 to 26.8 in); this is 15 to 20 cm (5.9 to 7.9 in) wider. For anyone who sleeps with an arm out, or turns over four times a night, that is the difference between the mat working and the mat being something you fall off.
It is also the number that decides whether two of these fit side by side. In most two-person tents, they will not.
Weight. Nothing, anywhere. The bullet heading calls it the compact lightest mat and then publishes only dimensions. On a 200 × 83 × 12 cm mat in 50D fabric, that figure would be worth having, and any comparison with the 550 g and 690 g mats in this group is impossible without it.
50D spring nylon sits between the 40D used on most mats here and the 75D on the heaviest-faced mat here. It is the middle answer on the trade between abrasion resistance and grams — and without a weight, only half of that trade can be checked.
Three TPU patches in the box. On a coated mat the patch chemistry has to match, and getting the right ones from the maker is worth more than the price of them.
Measure the tent floor. 83 cm (32.7 in) is generous for one and awkward for two, and it is the whole reason this mat exists.
The American Amazon catalog lists it with no seller standing behind the entry.
Every figure here is what Keepa held on the day this page was last revised. Offers and prices shift without warning.
A listing is not an offer: the reference exists on these stores, availability changes daily.
| R-value | Not published on the listing — no insulation figure appears in the listing |
|---|---|
| Standard quoted | None named — no ASTM F3340 reference appears in the listing |
| Thickness | 12 cm (4.7 in) — stated as part of a 200 × 83 × 12 cm (78.7 × 32.7 × 4.7 in) inflated size; the integrated pillow is given separately at 16.5 cm (6.5 in) high |
| Packed size | 32 × 14 × 10 cm (12.6 × 5.5 × 3.9 in) — stated as the deflated size |
| Weight | Not published on the listing — the listing calls the mat compact and light and gives no figure |
| Width | 83 cm (32.7 in) — stated as part of a 200 × 83 × 12 cm (78.7 × 32.7 × 4.7 in) inflated size |
| Length | 200 cm (78.7 in) — stated as part of a 200 × 83 × 12 cm (78.7 × 32.7 × 4.7 in) inflated size |
| Fabric denier | 50D spring nylon — stated, with a waterproof TPU coating |
| Inflation method | Integrated foot pump — stated at about 80 seconds to inflate, with a double-walled valve at the head end that deflates in about one second |
| Amazon reference | B0GK1XZ71W |
| EAN | 6978575168798 |
More than most people expect. A regular mat at 63 to 68 cm (24.8 to 26.8 in) leaves shoulders and elbows hanging over the edge, and whatever the mat’s insulation is, the parts of you off it are on the ground. 83 cm (32.7 in) is 15 cm (5.9 in) more than the usual, and it is the reason to look at this one.
Because an air mat is one puncture from being useless, and TPU patches have to match the coating to bond to it. Getting three from the maker means you are not hunting for a compatible kit the week you need one.
No. Not published on the listing — no insulation figure appears in the listing. What the listing does publish instead is the inflation method: Integrated foot pump — stated at about 80 seconds to inflate, with a double-walled valve at the head end that deflates in about one second.
7.8/ 10
The mat to look at if width is the problem, and the one that will not tell you what it weighs. Everything else is measured; the missing gram figure is odd on a listing that sells lightness in its own title.
Restless and broad-shouldered sleepers with room in the tent, who value 83 cm (32.7 in) of width over a published weight.
Amazon reports what buyers took in the month before this page was last checked: at least 200.
The figure is a floor, rounded by Amazon, and read through Keepa — it says what buyers picked, not what a maker claims.
Specifications: the manufacturer sheet for camping and hiking gear and the matching Amazon product page. Prices and availability: Keepa. Every figure on this page names its source.
R 2.1, standard unnamed · XPE foam with aluminum film · 70.8 × 23.6 × 0.36 in · 0.7 lb
A folding XPE foam mat with a heat-reflective aluminum film and a published insulation rating of 2.1 — "tested to standard", with the standard never named.
Best for: A foam layer that packs flat rather than rolled, with a figure behind its warmth
≈ $25
531 g (18.7 oz) · 190 × 60 cm (74.8 × 23.6 in) inflated and 225 × 70 cm (88.6 × 27.6 in) flat · 40D material · inflated by breath · repair kit included · no R-value
A 531 g (18.7 oz) mat that publishes both its flat and its inflated dimensions — an honest distinction most listings skip — and no thickness and no R-value.
Best for: Lightweight trips where 531 g (18.7 oz) and a 190 cm (74.8 in) sleeping length are the specification, and warmth comes from the bag.
Built-in foot pump · 40D nylon/TPU · 78 × 27 in · 3 in in one line, 8 in in the next
The widest mat in this group at twenty-seven inches, with a built-in foot pump, a built-in pillow and side buttons to join two together — and a thickness published as three inches and as eight.
Best for: Two mats buttoned into a double bed, with no separate pump or pillow to pack
≈ $30
Prices in these summaries were read on the dates each review gives. The live figure sits beside every product.
