Sleeping bags
Identical on the scales — so which of the two tells you what its numbers mean?
Both bags weigh the same on the listing: 1.55 kg on one, 1550 g on the other. From there they diverge on labelling rather than on kit. ALPIDEX splits a comfort figure from a limit figure and says its weight is a total; gipfelsport publishes a pair of temperatures with neither end named and a weight with nothing said about what it counts, and answers with a packed size the other one never gives.
| Compared on | four-season mummy bag, 400 GSM fill | four-season mummy bag, 1550 g, 300 GSM |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort rating | +4 °C, stated | Not stated as a comfort figure — the title publishes -20 °C and -5 °C, neither of them labelled |
| Limit rating | -2 °C, stated | Not stated as a limit figure — the same unlabelled pair is all that is published |
| Standard quoted | None named — neither EN 13537 nor ISO 23537 appears | None named — neither EN 13537 nor ISO 23537 appears |
| Fill density | 400 GSM, a fill density in grams per square metre | 300 g/m², a fill density in grams per square metre |
| Fill | Synthetic, stated as entirely polyester | Synthetic, stated as polyester |
| Shell denier | Not published — a hard-wearing water-repellent outer, with no yarn weight | Not published — a breathable rustle-free lining, with no fabric or yarn weight |
| Stated weight | 1.55 kg | 1550 g |
| What the weight figure covers | Stated as the total weight | Not published — no label says what is counted |
| Packed size | Not published — a compression sack is supplied and the pack size is described only as small | 38 × 23 cm, with straps to compress the stuff sack further |
Each tick belongs to its own line and nothing more. The row of ticks is not a score: the two verdicts underneath settle the page, because these two answer different questions on the trail.
The ALPIDEX is the one that puts its cards down: +4 °C and -2 °C published separately, 400 GSM of fill, and a weight it calls a total. It also publishes a third figure, -17 °C, as an extreme value, which is not a temperature anyone plans a night around. Nothing here is standardised, but at least each number says what it is meant to be.
The gipfelsport is the same 1550 g with a smaller published pack: 38 × 23 cm, and a stuff sack with compression straps, which is the figure that decides whether it goes inside your bag or under it. Its -20 °C and -5 °C arrive as an unlabelled pair, so the listing gives you two temperatures and no way of telling which is which.
Because comfort, limit and extreme are three different figures with three different meanings, and a pair given without labels could be any two of them. Reading the colder end as the usable one is exactly the mistake the labels exist to prevent.
The two units are the same thing, grams per square metre of fill, so the figures are directly comparable and 400 is the denser fill. It still describes the insulation per unit area rather than the total insulation in the bag, which depends on the cut and on how much of it there is.
Mummy · 400 GSM synthetic · comfort +4 °C and limit -2 °C stated · 1.55 kg total · compression sack · no standard named
The only bag here to publish a comfort and a limit figure separately — and, like every other bag in this group, it names no standard behind them.
Best for: Three-season camping where a stated comfort and limit pair matters more than a published packed size.
≈ 23 €
Mummy · 300 g/m² fill · 1550 g · 38 × 23 cm packed · 215 × 85 (55) cm · a pair of unlabelled temperatures
A mummy bag that publishes weight, packed size and a tapered cut, and puts two temperatures in its title without saying which is which.
Best for: Cold-weather camping where a 1550 g bag with a thermal collar and a known taper is what is wanted.
≈ 46 €
Prices in these summaries were read on the dates each review gives. The live figure sits beside every product.
