Shape and tie-out count decide how many pitches you actually get · review
NORDMUT 210T ripstop tarp, 10 × 10 ft review
A 3 × 3 m (10 × 10 ft) ripstop tarp with reinforced corners and eyelets, published without a weight, without a rating and without a count of the attachment points it advertises.
A green tarp stated at 300 × 300 cm (118.1 × 118.1 in) in 210T ripstop polyester, with reinforced corners and eyelets, described as waterproof and ultralight.
What is published
300 × 300 cm. A square cut, given plainly in the title, with a 3 × 4 m version named alongside it.
210T ripstop polyester. A weave and a fiber. Polyester barely stretches when wet, which is the property the hub intro sets against silicone-coated nylon.
Reinforced corners. Stated, and the corners are where a flat tarp tears when a pitch is drawn tight.
What is not
No weight. The listing calls it ultralight in two separate bullets and never puts a number to it.
No hydrostatic head, no coating named. It is called waterproof, and a fabric name is not a waterproof rating.
No tie-out count. Eyelets and well-chosen attachment points are both mentioned; neither is counted.
Nothing in the bag. No lines, no pegs, no poles.
Before ordering
Budget separately for guylines and pegs. On this listing they are not implied and not mentioned.
Availability
The American Amazon catalog lists it with no seller standing behind the entry.
Every figure here is what Keepa held on the day this page was last revised. Offers and prices shift without warning.
What it does well, and where it gives way
Strengths
Publishes a clear cut size, 300 × 300 cm (118.1 × 118.1 in), and names a second size in the same listing
Reinforced corners are stated, which is where a flat tarp fails under tension
The fabric is named as 210T ripstop polyester, which will not stretch when wet the way coated nylon does
Compromises
No weight anywhere behind the word ultralight, which is the claim the listing leads with
No hydrostatic head and no coating named, so nothing on the page quantifies rain resistance
Nothing supplied — no guylines, no pegs, no poles — and no tie-out count for the eyelets it mentions
Where this model is listed
A listing is not an offer: the reference exists on these stores, availability changes daily.
France
Germany
Italy
Spain
United Kingdom
United States
Specifications
Shape and cut
Rectangular flat cut, 300 × 300 cm (118.1 × 118.1 in) — stated; no catenary cut is described
Dimensions
300 × 4 m (984 × 13 ft) — stated in the title, which also names a 3 × 300 cm (1.2 × 118.1 in) version
Fabric and coating
210T ripstop polyester — stated; no coating is named
Hydrostatic head
Not published on the listing — the tarp is called waterproof, with no millimeter figure
Denier
Not published on the listing — 210T is a thread count and no denier figure is published
Tie-out count
Not published on the listing — eyelets and chosen attachment points are stated, and the total is not given
Tie-out reinforcement
Reinforced corners — stated
Weight
Not published on the listing — described as ultralight, with no figure
What the pack includes
Not published on the listing — no guylines, pegs or poles are listed
Amazon reference
B0GKVYBTJ8
EAN
8721472620634
What people ask before buying
What is 210T and why is it not a denier?
It is a thread count — the number of threads across a defined width — while denier is the weight of the yarn itself. The two describe different properties and do not convert into one another, so a tarp quoting 210T has not published a denier, and this hub keeps the columns separate for that reason.
Does ultralight mean anything without a figure?
Not for comparison purposes. Two tarps in this hub publish a weight and one publishes a packed size; this listing leads with the word and gives neither, so there is nothing to weigh it against.
Does NORDMUT publish a hydrostatic head?
No. Not published on the listing — the tarp is called waterproof, with no millimeter figure. What the listing does publish instead is the shape and cut: Rectangular flat cut, 300 × 300 cm (118.1 × 118.1 in) — stated; no catenary cut is described.
Our score
7.8/ 10
A clean cut size and reinforced corners, sold on the word ultralight with no figure behind it and nothing in the bag.
The buyer this one serves, among camping gear
A square tarp bought on cut size alone, by someone who already owns lines, pegs and poles.
What buyers actually choose
Amazon reports what buyers took in the month before this page was last checked: at least 50.
The figure is a floor, rounded by Amazon, and read through Keepa — it says what buyers picked, not what a maker claims.
Sources
Specifications: the manufacturer sheet for camping and hiking gear and the matching Amazon product page. Prices and availability: Keepa. Every figure on this page names its source.
Hammock tarp · 3.40 × 2.80 m (11 × 9 ft) · title says ripstop nylon, description says 210T polyester · 0.8 kg (1.8 lb) in the title, 650 g (22.9 oz) in the text · 25 × 10 cm (9.8 × 3.9 in) packed · bag only
A hammock tarp that contradicts itself twice on the same page — nylon or polyester, 0.8 kg (1.8 lb) or 650 g (22.9 oz) — while publishing the smallest packed size in this hub.
Best for: A hammock that needs a roof, where the packed size is the constraint and the contradictions are read first.
Camping tarp · 300 × 300 cm (118.1 × 118.1 in) · 150T ripstop polyester, 3000 PU coating · seam-sealed · webbing-reinforced load points · 1 kg (2.2 lb) stated · four ropes and four pegs supplied
A 3 × 3 m (10 × 10 ft) tarp with a coating figure, sealed seams, webbing at every load point and a stated 1 kg (2.2 lb) — and no count for the load points it reinforces.
Best for: A square tarp bought complete, where sealed seams and reinforced load points matter more than pack weight.
Camping tarp · 3 × 3 m (10 × 10 ft) · ripstop polyester, no coating named · 1.94 kg (4.3 lb) stated · 65 × 7 × 7 cm (25.6 × 2.8 × 2.8 in) packed · guylines and two poles supplied
A 3 × 3 m (10 × 10 ft) tarp that arrives with its own two poles and a stated 1.94 kg (4.3 lb) — and names no coating, no denier and no tie-out count at all.
Best for: A pitch on open ground — a beach, a pitch beside a vehicle — where poles matter more than pack weight.
