Shape and tie-out count decide how many pitches you actually get · review
NORDMUT tarp 300 × 300 cm, 210T ripstop polyester review
A 3 × 3 m ripstop tarp with reinforced corners and eyelets, published without a weight, without a rating and without a count of the attachment points it advertises.
The bottom line A clean cut size and reinforced corners, sold on the word ultralight with no figure behind it and nothing in the bag.
What this listing puts on record
A green tarp stated at 300 × 300 cm in 210T ripstop polyester, with reinforced corners and eyelets, described as waterproof and ultralight.
What is published
300 × 300 cm. A square cut, given plainly in the title, with a 3 × 4 m version named alongside it.
210T ripstop polyester. A weave and a fibre. Polyester barely stretches when wet, which is the property the hub intro sets against silicone-coated nylon.
Reinforced corners. Stated, and the corners are where a flat tarp tears when a pitch is drawn tight.
What is not
No weight. The listing calls it ultralight in two separate bullets and never puts a number to it.
No hydrostatic head, no coating named. It is called waterproof, and a fabric name is not a waterproof rating.
No tie-out count. Eyelets and well-chosen attachment points are both mentioned; neither is counted.
Nothing in the bag. No lines, no pegs, no poles.
Before ordering
Budget separately for guylines and pegs. On this listing they are not implied and not mentioned.
Availability
Selling at about 40 € on the German, French, Italian and Spanish Amazon stores when this page was checked.
It also sells on the British Amazon store in the local currency, which the range above does not cover — that range counts euro stores and nothing else.
Catalogued on the American Amazon store with nobody selling it: the reference is there, the offer is not.
Every figure in this section is what Keepa returned on the day this page was last updated. Prices and offers change without notice.
Prices quoted in this text were read on 6 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.
What it does well, and where it gives way
Strengths
Publishes a clear cut size, 300 × 300 cm, and names a second size in the same listing
Reinforced corners are stated, which is where a flat tarp fails under tension
The fabric is named as 210T ripstop polyester, which will not stretch when wet the way coated nylon does
Compromises
No weight anywhere behind the word ultralight, which is the claim the listing leads with
No hydrostatic head and no coating named, so nothing on the page quantifies rain resistance
Nothing supplied — no guylines, no pegs, no poles — and no tie-out count for the eyelets it mentions
Specifications
Shape and cut
Rectangular flat cut, 300 × 300 cm — stated; no catenary cut is described
Dimensions
300 × 300 cm — stated in the title, which also names a 3 × 4 m version
Fabric and coating
210T ripstop polyester — stated; no coating is named
Hydrostatic head
Not published on the listing — the tarp is called waterproof, with no millimetre figure
Denier
Not published on the listing — 210T is a thread count and no denier figure is published
Tie-out count
Not published on the listing — eyelets and chosen attachment points are stated, and the total is not given
Tie-out reinforcement
Reinforced corners — stated
Weight
Not published on the listing — described as ultralight, with no figure
What the pack includes
Not published on the listing — no guylines, pegs or poles are listed
Amazon reference
B0GKVYBTJ8 (same reference on 6 Amazon marketplaces)
EAN
8721472620634
What people ask before buying
What is 210T and why is it not a denier?
It is a thread count — the number of threads across a defined width — while denier is the weight of the yarn itself. The two describe different properties and do not convert into one another, so a tarp quoting 210T has not published a denier, and this hub keeps the columns separate for that reason.
Does ultralight mean anything without a figure?
Not for comparison purposes. Two tarps in this hub publish a weight and one publishes a packed size; this listing leads with the word and gives neither, so there is nothing to weigh it against.
Hammock tarp · 3.40 × 2.80 m · title says ripstop nylon, description says 210T polyester · 0.8 kg in the title, 650 g in the text · 25 × 10 cm packed · bag only
A hammock tarp that contradicts itself twice on the same page — nylon or polyester, 0.8 kg or 650 g — while publishing the smallest packed size in this hub.
Best for: A hammock that needs a roof, where the packed size is the constraint and the contradictions are read first.
Camping tarp · 300 × 300 cm · 150T ripstop polyester, 3000 PU coating · seam-sealed · webbing-reinforced load points · 1 kg stated · four ropes and four pegs supplied
A 3 × 3 m tarp with a coating figure, sealed seams, webbing at every load point and a stated 1 kg — and no count for the load points it reinforces.
Best for: A square tarp bought complete, where sealed seams and reinforced load points matter more than pack weight.