Skip to content

Arendo 500 ml vacuum flask, SUS 201 outer and SUS 304 inner vs Nuactiv 500 ml vacuum flask, 18/8, with a cotton sleeve

Same volume, same stated hours — what is left to separate two 500 ml vacuum flasks?

These two publish identical headline figures: 500 ml, 12 hours hot, 24 hours cold, double-walled and vacuum insulated. Six of the nine lines below are therefore ties, which is the honest result and also the point of the page. Neither states a starting temperature, an ambient temperature or a fill level behind those hours, and neither does any of the nine flasks in this hub, so the numbers cannot be read against each other.

Arendo 500 ml brushed stainless steel vacuum flask with a top carry handle

Arendo 500 ml vacuum flask, SUS 201 outer and SUS 304 inner

Wins 3 of 9

Check price

≈ 13 €

Nuactiv 500 ml stainless steel vacuum flask with its cotton carry sleeve

Nuactiv 500 ml vacuum flask, 18/8, with a cotton sleeve

Wins 0 of 9

Check price

≈ £12 / 10 €

Line by line

Compared on 500 ml vacuum flask, SUS 201 outer and SUS 304 inner 500 ml vacuum flask, 18/8, with a cotton sleeve
Capacity 500 ml — stated 500 ml — stated
Wall construction Double stainless shell with vacuum insulation — stated, and stated safe with carbonated drinks Double-wall vacuum insulation — stated, and stated to reduce condensation outside
Steel grade SUS 201 outer shell and SUS 304 inner shell — both stated 18/8 stainless steel — stated, described as food grade
Hot retention 12 hours — stated 12 hours — stated, quoted for coffee
Cold retention 24 hours — stated 24 hours — stated, quoted for water
Retention conditions stated Not published — no starting temperature, ambient temperature or fill level is given behind either figure Not published — no starting temperature, ambient temperature or fill level is given behind either figure
Lid type Removable screw lid with a full-jacket gasket, stated leak-proof, with a carry handle on top Screw cap — stated, described as helping to prevent leaks
Finish Brushed stainless steel — stated Not published — thirteen colours are offered and a cotton sleeve supplied; the coating is not named
Empty weight Not published Not published — described as lightweight, with no figure

Each tick belongs to its own line and nothing more. The row of ticks is not a score: the two verdicts underneath settle the page, because these two answer different questions on the trail.

Which one, for whom

Buy the Arendo 500 ml vacuum flask, SUS 201 outer and SUS 304 inner

The Arendo is the only flask in this hub to state a different steel inside and out, SUS 304 within and SUS 201 without, and it is the one here that describes its closure — a removable screw lid with a full-jacket gasket and a handle on the top. Where the two publish the same hours, this is what is left.

Buy the Nuactiv 500 ml vacuum flask, 18/8, with a cotton sleeve

The Nuactiv states the same 500 ml and the same 12 and 24 hours, names 18/8 steel and arrives with a cotton sleeve and thirteen colours to choose from. It calls itself lightweight and publishes no weight, and its screw cap is described rather than specified, which is why the closure line goes the other way.

What people ask before buying

If the hours are identical, is either flask actually better?

Nothing published here settles that. Both makers state 12 hours hot and 24 cold, and neither states the starting temperature, the ambient temperature or the fill level those hours rest on. Two unconditioned figures that agree are not a match, they are two claims that happen to be the same size.

Does SUS 304 inside mean more than 18/8?

The two listings do not put it in comparable terms. Arendo names two grades, one for each shell; Nuactiv names one grade for the flask. The extra information is on Arendo’s side, which is why that line goes to it — the line records who published a grade for what, and not a metallurgical ranking.

The full reviews

Prices in these summaries were read on the dates each review gives. The live figure sits beside every product.